ABSTRACT
Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a non-invasive method to detect and quantify pulmonary edema. However, it remains uncertain how components of the LUS examination should be aggregated into a score for quantifying pulmonary edema. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of various LUS scores with the extravascular lung water index (EVLWi) assessed with PiCCO in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: In this predefined secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized-controlled trial (InventCOVID), patients were included within 48h after intubation and underwent LUS and EVLWi measurement at two time points (first and fourth study day). EVLWi and ∆EVLWi were used as reference standard. Two 12-region scores (global LUS and LUS-ARDS), an 8-region anterior-lateral score and a 4-region B-line score were used as index tests. Pearson correlation was performed and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) for severe pulmonary edema (EVLWi>15mL/kg) was calculated. Results: 26 of 30 patients (87%) had complete LUS and EVLWi measurements at time point 1 and 24 of 29 patients (83%) at time point 2. The global LUS (r=0.54), LUS-ARDS (r=0.58) and anterior-lateral score (r=0.54) were significantly correlated with EVLWi, while the B-line score was not (r=0.32). ∆global LUS (r=0.49) and ∆anterior-lateral LUS (r=0.52) were significantly correlated with ∆EVLWi, while correlation of ∆LUS-ARDS (r=0.43) and ∆B-lines (r=0.32) did not reach statistical significance. AUROCC for EVLWi>15ml/kg was 0.73 for the global LUS, 0.79 for the anterior-lateral and 0.85 for the LUS-ARDS score. Conclusions: The global LUS, LUS-ARDS and antero-lateral score can quantify PiCCO-derived pulmonary edema measurements in COVID-19 ARDS. The LUS-ARDS score showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for severe pulmonary edema. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04794088, registered on 11 March 2021. European Clinical Trials Database number 2020-005447-23.